A Status Report on the Bald Eagle in the Connecticut River Watershed
By John Buck
photograph by Frank Dinardi
sketch by Bruce Macdonald
Dead drifting my canoe along a stretch of the upper Connecticut River a few miles upstream of the Wilder Dam, a flash of white against the dark green pine background revealed the perching spot of an adult Bald Eagle. I had been receiving credible reports of a pair of eagles in the area and wanted to see if I could confirm a nest or at least a territorial pair. Remaining motionless for fear of flushing the bird, I waited in hopes it might reveal a second adult or even a nest. Eagle nests are unusually difficult to spot by themselves, despite measuring as much as six feet in diameter and weighing several hundred pounds.
The upstream breeze counteracted the River’s current allowing me to remain in place for nearly an hour. A second bird never appeared and whether the eagle decided I wasn’t worth the risk of remaining, or it was hungry, or simply wanted to see more of the River, it flew off to the north. With a mighty push of its legs, shaking the pine bough as it released its grip, and a few deep powerful strokes of its six-foot wingspan, the eagle was soon out of sight. Though I had seen many eagles over the years, my feelings of awe and inspiration were just as profound as my first encounter so many years ago. It is no wonder the peoples of the Wampanoag, Pequot, Abenaki, and Quinnipiac, were among the many first Nations to revere the Bald Eagle and place them highly within their tribal rituals and customs.
Ever since the Continental Congress officially adopted the eagle in 1782 as our nation’s national symbol, the species has had a remarkably difficult existence during the past 200 years. Habitat loss due to extensive land clearing and polluted waterways, popular fashion using wild bird feathers, persecution, and later, the introduction of DDT into the food chain resulted in an estimated population of less than 500 nesting pairs in the lower 48 states by the 1960s. And, no nesting pairs were found in the Connecticut River basin as recently as 30 years ago. In fact all of New England was void of nesting Bald Eagles except for some of the coastal and more remote habitats of Maine.
Through public awareness and laws,
habitat quality steadily improved to the
point where eagles could find suitable
nesting and feeding habitat.
Today’s eagle population is a different story. There are an estimated 10,000 nesting pairs in the 48 lower states including at least 50 pairs in the Connecticut River basin. Through public awareness and laws such as the Migratory Bird Treaty ACT (1918), the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940), the Clean Waters Act (1972), and the Endangered Species Act (1973), habitat quality steadily improved to the point where eagles could find suitable nesting and feeding habitat. These actions and the banning of DDT in 1972 allowed for the growth and resurgence of Bald Eagles throughout the land. So well has the eagle population recovered that it was removed from the federal endangered species list in 2007. This success story is being repeated in the Connecticut River Basin, too.
The lower part of the River was first to experience the eagle’s return. First to have eagles disappear from the state, Massachusetts last recorded nesting eagles in Sandwich in 1905. But from 1982 to 1988 the state undertook an aggressive effort to reestablish a nesting population by importing orphaned eagle chicks from the Great Lakes region of Michigan and neighboring Canada. The transplanting work centered on the Quabbin Reservoir where, during the six-year reintroduction, 41 eaglets were raised to adulthood, and by 1988, Massachusetts had their first nesting eagles in 83 years. Success at Quabbin extended beyond its borders to include 11 pairs along the Connecticut River by 2018. Eagles are a regular sight along the River in Massachusetts. Turner’s Falls (Greenfield) and vicinity has proved popular for nesting eagles. So well have the eagles faired in Massachusetts that the state has proposed the species be down-listed from threatened to a species of special concern.
Farther downstream, Bald Eagles have experienced similar success. Sharing the story of the eagle’s perilous decline with the other Connecticut River states, Connecticut was fortunate to retain a modest residual population of wintering eagles along its lengthy Long Island coastline, especially at the mouths of major rivers like the Connecticut. But, in 1992, a pair of eagles successfully reared two chicks in Litchfield County. Since then the state’s eagle population has steadily grown to where the state downlisted the eagle population from endangered to threatened in 2010. Connecticut’s eagle population continues to expand and by 2018, state biologists estimated between 50–55 pairs to be residing in the state. Although winter continues to be the best time to view eagles in towns such Haddam and Essex, tributaries of the Connecticut like the Scantic River in Sommersville and Shenipsit Lake in Ellington also support a feeding habitat and potential nesting territories as well as offer viewing opportunities.
Getty Images, Mariusz Stanosz
Vermont and New Hampshire have shared a long and interesting history together. Beginning with the fact that, while New Hampshire was one of the original 13 colonies to form the United States, Vermont (once named New Connecticut) remained as an independent nation from 1777 until 1791 when it was admitted to the union as the 14th state. That subtle but important difference is still played out in many things today including Bald Eagle restoration. The difference is due to the fact that 90 percent of the River between the two states belongs to New Hampshire. The eagles, however, don’t know that, nor do they care. Eagles on both sides of the River hunt the River’s tributaries in both states. The only boundary lines they are concerned with are those established by the eagles themselves. Like so much of the habitat in Massachusetts and Connecticut, reforestation along the upper reaches of the River is, once again, an excellent eagle habitat.
New Hampshire reported its first successful nest in 1988 in the Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge. Though not part of the Connecticut River drainage, the first eagle nest is always significant. As New Hampshire’s eagle population steadily grew other major water bodies began to attract the expanding population including the Connecticut River. From Hinsdale on the Massachusetts line to Northumberland in Coos County, near the Quebec border, eagles have taken advantage of the hundreds miles of unoccupied habitat. New Hampshire officials report over 50 nesting pairs in the state today with nearly a dozen calling the Connecticut River their home.
Vermont, on the other hand, despite its abundant unoccupied habitat, is one of the last states in the lower 48 to have a nesting pair of Bald Eagles. For reasons known only to the eagles, Vermont’s first modern day nesting pair was discovered in Springfield in 2002. As is often the case with new nesting pairs, success often requires more than one season’s attempt. However, nesting success finally occurred with another pair farther upstream in the town of Concord in 2008, and the Springfield pair was eventually successful. With that, Vermont ended a 60-year absence of the species from the state. As with the other three Connecticut River watershed states, Vermont’s repopulation progressed in fits and starts. Today, record numbers of eagle nests and offspring are being reported each year centered on the state’s three major eagle waterbodies (including Lake Champlain and Lake Memphremagog). Vermont wildlife officials report over 30 nesting pairs in the state with nearly a third of them lining the western shore of the River. However, without those first nests along the Connecticut River, the Bald Eagle’s resurgence would have been delayed even further.
A mere 50 years ago there were an estimated 450 nesting pairs of Bald Eagles in the entire continental United States. Today there are that many in New England alone. Whether by human assisted transplant efforts or through natural expansion of populations along the coast of Maine and Long Island Sound, it is clear the Connecticut River has served as a vital destination for Bald Eagle recovery. With continued habitat protection efforts, vigilance towards environmental toxins, and preventing dilution of important legal protections (e.g. Migratory Bird Treaty Act), the upper limits of Bald Eagle occupation in the basin are yet to be seen. There is still much unoccupied habitat within the River basin. Although Bald Eagles are normally quite wary of people, some have shown more tolerance than others and will likely continue to expand in Connecticut and Massachusetts. With so much unclaimed habitat in New Hampshire and Vermont yet to be spoken for, the future for this magnificent species looks very bright along the 410 miles of the Connecticut River.
JOHN BUCK is a fifth generation Vermonter. John’s interest in the natural world was shaped during his early years in rural Orange County at a time when there were more cows than people.
John received his BS and MS degrees in Wildlife Biology at University of Vermont. Following graduation, John was hired by the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department as a founding staff member of the Department’s new wildlife habitat management program for private and public lands. Throughout his 39-year career, John managed habitat conservation projects. Until his recent retirement, John focused on threatened and endangered species and conservation of their respective habitats.
In his new career, along with his family, John runs a small organic bird-friendly maple syrup operation in Washington, Vermont. When not working the woods, John sings in the baritone section with the Burlington-based choral group Solaris Vocal Ensemble and with the Vermont Symphony Chorus.
American folklore has it that Benjamin Franklin suggested to the Continental Congress that the Wild Turkey be selected for the national symbol instead of the Bald Eagle. While that suggestion cannot be substantiated, he did offer in a 1784 letter to his daughter that the turkey is a far more respectable bird as indicated by its cunning and bravery. Franklin went on to describe the eagle as having a “low moral character” for its reputation as a thief and a bully. Though the turkey is all of what Benjamin Franklin described it as, I turned my canoe for the Vermont shore thinking how different history might have been had the Founders chosen anything but the Bald Eagle.
Text and photos by Emily Dixon
A dreamed of trip becomes a reality— paddling down our Connecticut River
I know the mouth of the Connecticut River well. My commute between my parents’ houses was faster by water than car, crossing the channel from North Cove in Essex to head to the protected Lord’s Cove in Old Lyme. I grew up with osprey squawks, an occasional swimming deer, and telling the tide by the directions of the boats in the mooring fields. Years later at Smith College, I often saw the Connecticut River while biking, watching the ice flows in February with huge tree trunks fouling the pilings in April. I often thought about paddling my way downstream from college to home. There was never enough time until, five years later, the trip finally materialized.
This past summer, I canoed from Northampton, Massachusetts, to Long Island Sound with my partner, Connor O’Neill. We used The Connecticut River Boating Guide: Source to Sea by John Sinton, Elizabeth Farnsworth, and Wendy Sinton for our route and daily map. It fit perfectly into a gallon Ziploc and was perched on a dry bag throughout the trip. The trip was 92.5 miles, and we added a few slight detours to round it up to a 100 miler. This is my diary:
Day 1
Elwell Recreation Area → Brunelle’s Marina
Mileage: 7 miles
Elwell Recreation Area in Northampton, Massachusetts, in our trusty, blue 16’ Old Town fiberglass canoe, Mudbug, a common nickname for our favorite seafood snack, crawfish. After triple checking gear and finding the 35 perfect stow positions for various dry bags, we set off. With all our food and 20 liters of water, the gunnels seemed dangerously close to the wave tops at the protected boat launch. After a beautiful and uneventful short paddle, we arrived at Brunelle’s Marina.
Day 2
Brunelle’s Marina → Holyoke Rows
Mileage: 7.5 miles
Initially, excited to read in the guide books about the power company providing a shuttle service to paddlers to circumvent the Holyoke Dam. When our ride came in the morning, we chatted and decided that we would regret not doing the portage on foot. We pulled out at South Hadley Canoe Club and carried all of our equipment the one mile through Hadley to launch at Beachgrounds Park. While resting our tired backs at the South Hadley Public Library, we were offered a ride, which we also turned down. A little stubbornness got us a long way on this portage. The canoe over our heads was light as a feather compared to the heavy dry bags digging into our shoulders. After launching in the shallow water below the dam, we had a quick paddle to the community rowing and paddling organization, Holyoke Rows, to camp for the night. This was well timed because big thunderstorms rolled through that afternoon. We set up our tent on the club’s open porch and rode out the storms by cooking good food and napping in the hammock.
Day 3
Holyoke Rows → King’s Island
Mileage: 15.5 miles
Waking up to a clear sky, we launched Mudbug under the watchful eye of a beaver building his home under the floating dock. North of Springfield, Massachusetts, we spotted three large creatures hopping on the west bank of the River. As we paddled closer, we realized, to our delight, that the creatures were actually a family of bald eagles. We slipped by silently in our canoe, mesmerized by their beauty, size, and comedic antics. As we approached the Route I-91 bridge, we stuck to the east bank of the River knowing the breached dam, and subsequently the Enfield rapids, were ahead. The water picked up speed making its way around the initial structure of the old dam. Thinking we were safely below the dam and had avoided a second portage, we celebrated and moved confidently back into the middle of the River. Our revery was interrupted by the increasing low roar of falling water. We paddled furiously back to the safety of the east bank in time to navigate Mudbug over an eight inch drop. We breathed a sigh of relief, knowing the breached dam was now actually behind us; ahead lay King’s Island.
The campsite was located on the northeast side of the island. After setting up camp on one of the two tent platforms constructed with the help of the sports retailer, REI, we paddled to some smaller islands located close by. The smaller islands provided a great place to float in the current and drip dry in the setting sun.
Day 4
King’s Island → Island North of Route 291
Mileage: 13 miles
As we made our way south, the River widened; the water was fast and crystal clear. We paddled atop fields of eelgrass and hidden fish darting between the blades. Making our way closer and closer to Hartford, we decided to take a brief detour up the Farmington River for a midday hot dog at Bart’s. After struggling against the current, a hot dog loaded with sauerkraut and a tall root beer were a welcomed prize. We set up camp on an unnamed island located north of the Bissell Bridge. The island became quite busy with people fishing, jet skiers, and kids running around, all enjoying the River at sunset.
Day 5
Island N of Route 291 → River Highlands Park
Mileage: 17.5 miles
We started out early knowing we had many miles ahead of us. We were joined by the Hartford Riverfront Rowing Club as they rowed north and we paddled south. Filling up with potable water at the Hartford boat house, we stopped and enjoyed a breakfast snack with bustling Hartford in the background. South of Hartford, the scenery became more industrial with infrastructure for old barge traffic and a faint odor from local landfills. Reaching Crows Point, near the Glastonbury Boathouse, the River was wild once again, hosting lots of enthusiastic water skiers. By the time we reached River Highlands we were exhausted. After a lovely dinner on a riverside picnic table, we fell asleep while several owls hooted nearby.
Day 6
River Highlands → Chapman Pond
Mileage: 20.5 miles
Setting off in early morning fog, we were accompanied by great blue herons hunting for breakfast along the bank. They leapfrogged downriver as we glided past. As the day progressed and the River got deeper and wider, motorboat and jet ski traffic increased. We tied up our boat at the Blue Oar in Haddam, Connecticut, for a well earned hamburger.
Our boat was the smallest and dirtiest on the dock. As we entered the restaurant, it became clear by our appearance (and our smell) that we had been traveling for some time.
After waving goodbye, we continued past the Goodspeed Opera House on the eastern shore. The entrance to Chapman Pond was barely discernible behind a group of small islands covered by small motorboats. As we passed through the narrow entrance, the pond opened up before us. We noticed a small break in the bank’s brush indicating a campsite nearby. A short walk up the hill were two tent platforms in an open wooded area with views of the pond below. After setting up camp, we paddled back out for a refreshing River swim and boat wash. A slight breeze at the site made for a wonderfully bug free night.
Day 7
Chapman Pond → Long Island Sound
Mileage: 14.5 miles
Waking up with several people fishing in the pond, we made our way south observing many osprey along the way. As we neared Gillette Castle, the ferry was dutifully making its trips back and forth across the River amongst fish leaping out of the water. We turned east into Selden Creek, following the marshy waters and enjoying the peaceful respite from motorboat wakes. A brief stop in downtown Essex, where we fueled on our first coffee in a week, gave us the push we needed to make it to the sound. We battled large waves near the gas dock on the east bank at the railroad bridge before tucking into the end of the Lieutenant River for the final stretch through the marsh creeks leading to the Sound. We passed crabbers and paddle boarders along the twists and turns before the current picked up and soon we were in the Sound. We were amazed at how shallow the water was at Griswold Point and ceremoniously dipped our last smoked pepperoni stick into the water for a celebratory bite, our journey having come to a close.
……………………………………………………
The paddle down the River displayed the wide range of life the River supports, from abundant wildlife to the industrial Springfield skyline to happy shrieks emanating from the rides at Six Flags. This trip would not have been possible without the help and support of our parents. Collectively, they took care of our dog, drove us to our launch, stored our gear, and towed us back from the Sound. The food was plentiful from homemade cookies to mid-trip burgers, and the finale on the grill; we are grateful.
By Judy Preston
Photography by Jody Dole
The aquatic plant known as Trapa natans has the unfortunate common name of water chestnut, leading people who are first hearing about it to think that it may well be a bonus source of that good appetizer, with a strip of bacon wrapped around it.
But the reality is, this non-native species is an aggressive rooted aquatic plant with floating leaf rosettes and a central submerged cord that can extend up to 16 feet, enabling it to form a dense mat on the water’s surface. By July, plants produce a whorl of seeds (nuts) below the water’s surface that detach and sink once mature. Seeds have been shown to remain viable for up to twelve years, underscoring the threat of long-term establishment once this plant takes hold.
Hadlyme resident Humphrey Tyler surrounded by water chestnut plants removed by volunteers last summer from Connecticut River’s Selden Cove.
This invasive species has gradually been moving down the Connecticut River from several large concentrations in Massachusetts. In 2011, a baseline effort to locate, map, and remove occurrences in the Connecticut River estuary was funded by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, working with the Connecticut River Estuary Regional Planning Agency (subsequently RiverCOG) in Essex. Several large populations have been located in the estuary, including in Salmon Cove, Selden Cove, and even on the Connecticut River mainstem.
Early detection and control is essential to controlling Water Chestnut; extensive infestations in Lake Champlain in Vermont, and the Hudson River estuary in New York make it unlikely that complete eradication will be possible in those waters. Our estuary abounds with largely intact fresh, brackish, and saltwater tidal wetlands that are essential habitat for a concentration of resident and migratory bird and fish species. Water Chestnut has the potential to fundamentally alter the ability of the Connecticut River estuary ecosystem to continue to support the biological, economic, and social amenities that have been its hallmark.
Friends of Whalebone Cove President Diana Fiske, in blue kayak on right, helped organize more than 30 volunteers in kayaks, canoes, and motor boats...who spent more than 125 hours last summer pulling thousands of water chestnut plants out of Selden Cove.
In 2018, after the discovery of large concentrations of another aquatic invasive plant, Hydrilla, in the Connecticut River north of Middletown, an email list serve was formalized to help conservationists problem solve about how to protect the Connecticut River and its many coves and marshes. It will take the persistence, resources, and energy of many people to stem the tide of these plants in the estuary—and the entire watershed.
Hadlyme resident Joe Standart empties a bag of water chestnut plants removed by volunteers of the Hadlyme conservation group Friends of Whalebone Cove.
If you think you have found either of these plants, or are interested in helping join the effort to keep it out of the Connecticut River estuary, please contact Judy Preston ( judy.preston@uconn.edu), Margot Burns (mburns@rivercog.org), or Friends of Whalebone Cove (fowchadlyme@gmail.com).
Judy Preston works for the Long Island Sound Study and CT Sea Grant at UConn’s Avery Point campus in Groton. She lives in Old Saybrook.
One of 10 cartloads of water chestnut plants removed from Lyme’s Selden Cove last summer.
Confronting an Ongoing Challenge
Part I of River Cleanup Series
Following a recent major storm, a 500-gallon propane tank floated down the Connecticut River and mushed into the sand just north of Calves Island in Old Lyme, Connecticut. It arrived at high tide and was stuck there for some days. People who ventured near departed quickly after getting a whiff of the propane gas leaking from the tank. A police boat approached the itinerant tank and backed off. An inflatable fireboat came, sniffed, and also backed off. Finally, experts in handling such matters snared the tank and hauled it away.
“White River Junction” had been stenciled on the tank’s side in large block letters. There are a dozen dams between White River Junction, Vermont, and Old Lyme, Connecticut. Had this tank made its way over these dams, bouncing and bobbing the 187 miles almost to the River’s mouth? Someone who might have known the answer is David Wordell. As a young man, Wordell had navigated the Connecticut River in a small boat in August 1953, powered by a 5 HP Scott-Atwater outboard on a five-day round trip from Essex, Connecticut, to Holyoke, Massachusetts. Since then, Mr. Wordell has spent over 50 years boating and exploring every tributary of the beautiful Connecticut River as far north as Hadley, Massachusetts.
In 1968, David, an officer of the Southeastern Connecticut Regional Planning Agency, was appointed as their representative to the newly created Eastern Connecticut Resource Conservation and Development Area, Inc., which was nationally sponsored by the US Soil Conservation & Stabilization Service, a division of the US Department of Agriculture. In 1970, he was elected SCRPA’s president, serving until 1984.
A marine chart used by Wordell to record dumpsites along the river.
A page from Wordell’s pollution log book.
During the summer of 1981, David and his childhood exploring friend, James Bullock, traveled once again by boat to Wethersfield (CT) Cove. On marine charts, they recorded over a dozen dump sites polluting the water of this beautiful scenic River. Convincing Eastern Connecticut RC&D to take on this lofty, multi-year project, Wordell conceived and orchestrated a clean-up of the dumpsites that were unattractive and leeching petrochemicals and other contaminants into the River. He wrote letters to the mayor or selectman of every town that had junk on the River’s banks and to companies that were contributing to the mess. Boy Scouts volunteered to clean up 400 acres along the Glastonbury shoreline filling 5 large dump trucks with debris.
Wordell enlisted the support of the Soil Conservation & Stabilization Service. He testified before both houses of Congress. He took title to over 2 dozen junk cars, cars that had been abandoned, even some that had been ditched during prohibition (VIN numbers, Vehicle Identification Numbers, had not yet been implemented) in order to turn them over to a recycling center. He wrote homeowners seeking permission to remove junk from their riverside property. He even persuaded the Connecticut National Guard to bring their large equipment to remove many old, half-buried automobiles. Some clean-up efforts required use of the US Army’s 16-wheel drive vehicles to avoid getting stuck on the sandy beach.
Connecticut National Guardsmen and the 16-wheel drive vehicles.
In 1982, Mr. Wordell helped to establish the New England Resource, Conservation & Development Council and became its 1st president. Having helped clean up the banks of the River in Connecticut, he then influenced the RC&D Councils bordering the rest of the 410-mile Connecticut River in Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire to do the same, which took another two years to accomplish.
Mr. Wordell was the recipient of the Governor’s Distinguished Service Award, given in January of 1984, honoring his service and achievement in the preservation of the Connecticut River and his contributions to the RC&D.
David Wordell is a living testament to what one determined, dedicated individual can do in his or her spare time. At the time, Wordell was teaching mathematics at a regional middle school. Previously, he had been an engineer perfecting the top speeds of the first atom-powered submarines at General Dynamics’ Electric Boat Division in Groton, Connecticut. Today, he and his wife, Lois, manage a small farm in Salem, Connecticut, that is home to their registered Haflinger horses and Romney sheep; their farm also houses a museum of antique carriages and sleighs restored to mint condition (www.ransomfarm.com).
David Wordell has produced the definitive documentary of Selden Island. Estuary plans to feature more of Wordell’s work in future issues.
A US Army truck hauls away an old automobile.
Ed Note: This is the first of a multi-part series dealing with the cleanup of the Connecticut River, especially the actions resulting from the Clean Water Act of 1972. This cleanup of chemicals, industrial waste, water treatment runoff, and other pollutants is a remarkable story of what is possible when confronting an ongoing challenge. It is also a story of how vigilance and effort today can maintain what’s good, improve what needs improving, and open the doors for thousands more to enjoy the natural wonders of this worthy River.
By Erik Hesselberg
Artwork and objects courtesy of the Connecticut River Museum. Shad Shack painting by Janette Boothby. Photography by Jody Dole. Shad Drawing from Getty Images, gyro
On a fly by day or a gill net by night, when the shad run, we fish!
Early on an April morning, a cold mist lies over the Connecticut River. When the sun breaks through and the mist rises, there is shimmering on the water. Regularly, for a brief moment, the modern melds into the timeless and across the expanse of marshes and blue water you see the silver flash and hear the blare of a diesel horn from the Old Lyme Draw every time an Amtrak train speeds along the old truss railroad bridge. You imagine some of the busy commuters on their way between Boston and New York looking up from their laptops to refresh themselves with a view of the tidal creeks and coves and the wide River meeting the waters of Long Island Sound beyond. The sleeping yachts are still wrapped in their white plastic cocoons for the winter. Marking the shore in the distance stands Lynde Point Lighthouse, and beyond, Saybrook Outer Light.
The brackish water of the wide estuary is warming past 40 degrees Fahrenheit. In front yards, yellow forsythia has appeared, and clusters of yellow daffodils push up. The season has begun, and the shad are running. Where marsh becomes damp woods, you can still see here and there among the bare branches the fresh white blossoms of a small tree above the fiddlehead ferns and green shoots of skunk cabbage. This is a species of Amelanchier, the shadbush, given this homely name by the early English settlers because it flowers about the same time huge schools of shad return from the ocean and swim up New England tidal rivers.
A dirt road full of potholes leads down by an abandoned power station to an old stone wharf with weathered wooded slips along one side. Powerboats are predominant, but once at Ferry Dock, as this wharf is known, you see the remnants of a fishing fleet—a 40-foot trawler, a few lobster boats, and several flat-bottomed, open skiffs about 20 feet long. Back from the water among the fishermen’s cottages is Ted’s Bait Shop, owned by Ted Lemelin, who used to take one of the long skiffs out at night to set his drift nets for the spring shad fishing. Ted is a hard guy to know, but one night in May, he agreed to take me out fishing with him.
There has been shad fishing on the Connecticut River—more or less this kind of laying out of carefully arrange weirs or barriers—for thousands of years. River Indians called the first full moon in March the Shad Moon. (Today, on the Connecticut River shad season runs from April 1 to June 15.) Taking his cue from Native belief, Connecticut poet John G.C. Brainard in 1824 wrote “The Shad Spirit,” telling of a spirit guide in the form of a great bird who appeared in early spring to lead the fish schools up the coast to the mouth of the Connecticut River:
To fair Connecticut’s northernmost source,
O’er sand-bars rapids and falls,
The Shad Spirit holds its onward course,
With the flocks with his whistle calls.
The broad estuary between Saybrook and Old Lyme bristled with fishing piers. From the piers haul-seining crews worked nets a quarter mile long. A thousand or even two thousand fish in a single sweep of the net was not uncommon. Shad was so plentiful it was used as fertilizer or shipped to the slave-worked sugar plantations of the Caribbean. However, with the steamboat the fresh catch could be packed on ice and sent overnight to New York and Boston. The humble fish began to rise in estimation, and soon Connecticut River shad and shad roe graced the tables of flossy restaurants like New York’s Delmonico’s.
A planked shad dinner is still a seasonal treat, although the market for the fish has dwindled, as an older generation raised with shad bakes and the like slowly disappears. Today, only a handful of boats go out at night to lay drift nets for shad, classified as an “artisanal fishery” fading into folklore. In 10 years, the gillnet shad fishery will have likely disappeared altogether. “It’s hard work and you fish at night, so you’re going without sleep for the five- or six-week season,” a fisheries biologist told me. “The gear hasn’t changed in 100 years. Only a few diehards do it now.”
Some years ago at Ferry Dock, I met Reginald “Butch” Rutty, a commercial fisherman for 40 years. Rutty talked about the days when 20 boats raced out to the Railroad Bridge at night during shad season to be the first on the fishing grounds. The bridge marked the top of the “reach,” the territories of water allotted to fishermen over generations to lay their nets. “The first boat on berth earned the right to the first drift,” Rutty said. “You’d anchor your boat on the south side of the bridge to establish your spot. Some guys got out there early, which was O.K. as long you left your net in the boat.”
Rutty got his start fishing with Kenny Swain, a hardnosed commercial fisherman out of Old Saybrook who described his line of work as “a tough racket.” Rutty signed on as Swain’s “striker,” or junior partner, but a few weeks in, may have questioned the decision when their 35-foot fishing boat was broadsided by a 54-foot cabin cruiser, nearly slicing it in two. Swain and Rutty were thrown into the water but were plucked up by a passing vessel. Both were bruised and battered but refused medical attention and were back fishing the next day.
Kenny Swain fished right to the end. They still talk about the bitter cold January morning in 1980, when Swain collapsed on his boat on Long Island Sound. A passing boat spotted the distressed vessel, but it was too late. Swain’s death was a blow to the tight-knit Old Saybrook fishing community, especially Lemelin, who also got his start fishing with Swain. Indeed, much of what he knew about shad, he said he learned from Swain.
There was fog in the evening. The next day, Ted called to say the weather would be clear and he was fishing that night if I wanted to tag along. It was long after midnight when we pushed off from the dock and headed out into the blackness of the Connecticut River. John Rogers, Ted’s fishing partner, was in the bow. Approaching a red buoy, Ted cut the motor. With his free hand he directed a floodlight onto the downstream side of the buoy—No. 14, marking the eastern edge of the dredged channel. Shad gill-netters typically fish an ebbtide, letting the net drift down with the current a mile or so before taking it up. You don’t want it to move too fast. “I don’t know, Johnny,” he said to Rogers. “The current’s still running pretty good.” When shad, a schooling ocean fish, come into the River to spawn, they follow the deep channels. Approximately half a million fish would head upriver that year, which meant a half million fish would pass Red Buoy No. 14. Ted would be happy to intercept 150 of these fish, but his success tonight seemed to depend on how well he read the eddy coming off the buoy. “I don’t want the current to take my net down too fast and get all hung up in South Cove,” Ted said. “It’s kind of a crap shoot.”
Leaning on the throttle, Ted cruised upriver to a spot just south of the railroad bridge where he would make his set. He and John wear the uniform of commercial fishermen everywhere—flame-orange, rubberized bib overalls and wool caps. They are heavily bearded. Working in tandem, they began paying out 1,500 feet of net across the channel in a long, lazy arc. Shad have a remarkable ability to detect and avoid nets. But they can’t see them at night. Swimming into the nylon monofilament, the fish are caught at the gills.
These gill nets have 5 1/2-inch meshes which select for the coveted female roe shad. (Males are called bucks.) Ted’s net is 15 feet deep, about the depth of the channel, held down in the water by metal rings and buoyed by plastic floats, still called “corks” from the old days. The rings tear off if the net gets hung up on the bottom. Battery operated lights mark the ends, a rare concession to modern technology. One is blue, blinking—a signal to other boaters to stay clear. Ted and John would let the net drift down with the current about a mile before taking it up, just above South Cove. If they’re lucky, they would catch some fish.
Between us and the bridge we saw the lights of a fishing boat. “That’s Gary,” Ted said, referring to Gary Rutty, Butch Rutty’s brother. Amos Swain and his crew were also out tonight. Ted shook his head. “Three boats! Hell, I remember when you had to fight for your spot there were so many shad boats on the water. One guy would set, then another and another right on down the line. If you didn’t set in time, you’d lose your spot. There were fistfights back at the dock.”
Originally from Bath, Maine, Ted came to Old Saybrook in the 1970s. Shad fishing was booming. “I had 12 people working for me,” he said. “Sometimes, we boned 1,000 fish a day. Dock & Dine was buying 200 pounds of fish a week. It was good money. You could clear $5,000 even $10,000, in just five or six weeks. Today, kids don’t even know what a shad is. All my customers are old. When they come to pick up their fish, I’ve got to bring it over to them because they can’t walk.”
At 3 a.m. on the Connecticut River, the air is cool, damp, and salty-tanged. Mist rises from black, glassy water. The long, low silhouette of Great Island stretches away to Long Island Sound. Off in the distance, Lynde Point Light winks on, then off. Ted shined his floodlight along the length of his net. It was lying diagonally across the channel.
“She’s sagging and I ain’t bragging,” Rogers said, referring to the belly in the —not an encouraging sign. “We’ll be lucky if we catch 10 fish,” Ted grumbled.
The two fishermen start hauling. The first 50 feet contain only stripers, the bane of the shad fishermen, as they eat shad. They also foul your nets. Commercial striped bass fishing is banned, so this bycatch goes over the side. Finally, a shad. Then two, three. Ensnared in the net, the fish barely twitch. Ted and John extract the gilled fish by gripping them tightly between their knees and forcing their heads through the tight meshes. The shad are tossed into a plastic tub in the stern. More net, more shad. The tub is filling up. By the time all 1,500 feet of net is in the boat, 40 shad lie in the tub, their big silvery scales shimmering under glaring lights.
Ted would go broke if he had to rely just on shad fishing for his income. His real work is running his bait shop and a car-towing business. Ted was discouraged when his son didn’t want to carry on the tradition. “The other day I asked him what wanted to do when he was older,” Ted said. “You know what he said? ‘Dad, I can tell you what I’m not going to do. I’m not going to be a fisherman.’”
Two hours on the River and all Ted has to show for it is 40 fish. Still, there are other compensations. Few places are as peaceful as the Connecticut this May night. At 3 a.m., Ted and John own the River. Looking down at hiscatch, Ted says, “I don’t know John. It ain’t great. But it ain’t bad. I think we’ll make another drift.”
Erik Hesselberg has been writing about the Connecticut River for twenty years, first as an environmental reporter for the Middletown Press, and then as executive editor of Shore Line Newspapers in Guilford, where he oversaw twenty newspapers. He lives in Haddam, Connecticut, where he is at work on a book about Connecticut River steamboats. A portion of this story previously appeared in the New Haven Register in a slightly different form.
“Seasonal Ecology Mural” by Mike di Giorgio. Courtesy of Connecticut River Museum. Photo by Cultural Preservation Technologies.
In 2016, the Connecticut River Museum commissioned renowned wildlife artist Mike DiGiorgio to create a painting that would bring to life the tidal marshes of the lower Connecticut River. The painting was photographed by award-winning photographer Jody Dole and enlarged to a mural that is 81 ¼” L x 76” H and installed as a permanent exhibit at the Museum.
The goal of the mural project was to complete the important story of the ecological significance of the river, thereby enhancing school programming and visitor experiences, as well as increasing opportunities to foster environmental scholarship. The mural highlights the seasonality of the ecosystem from left to right, spring to winter. From top to bottom, the mural beautifully highlights the terrestrial landscapes of the forests in the background, the wetland transitional ecosystem, and the foreground aquatic ecosystem. The more commonly known native and invasive flora and fauna are accurately depicted in their ecosystems in the season they are blooming or most active. In spring, migratory birds have arrived on the river and it is common to see Osprey (Pandion haliaetus) hunting or preparing their nests, while the Swamp Rose Mallow (Hibiscus moscheutos L.) is blooming and the American Shad (Alosa sapidissima) is migrating to the streams that they were born in. In the summer months, insects such as the Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) and Wandering Glider (Pantala flavescens) are as active as the macroinvertebrates in the water and the frogs lingering on the water’s edge. As fall approaches, animals prepare to migrate south, such as the Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), and the deciduous trees prepare for dormancy but not before they give us a dazzling display of color. Winter on the river is a time when you can see into the forests and catch a glimpse of a coyote (Canis latrans) or red fox (Vulpes vulpes) or look up in amazement to see a Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) soaring on the wind. This mural captures the essence of the river ecosystem from living to nonliving organisms: the color of the water, the movement of the clouds, and the life cycle of the trees. There are more plants and animals that are well-camouflaged and not easily seen until further investigation. Not to be missed are the invasive species that pop-up in the water such as water chestnut (Trapa natans) and on land such as common reed (Phragmites australis).
The lower Connecticut River is a unique and special place. By bringing attention to the organisms that live and interact in this ecosystem, the Connecticut River Museum enriches both visitor and student understanding of the complex tidelands. Each niche can be further explored and understood in the interactions that make up the biodiversity of the Connecticut River. The mural assists in our appreciation of why we need to be stewards of the river, and how humans can impact the overall health of the Connecticut River.
Arrow-arum, water purslane, and false
pimpernel are new to me now
that I live on a riverine tidal marsh.
These plants grow about or in the cove
where, out with the tide and in,
the common mummichog and banded
killifish swim. I imagine if I’ve seen a thing—
golden club, sweet flag, reed canary grass—
its name will spring to mind when
I want it to, but the deep truth is I enjoy
the luscious touch of common names
about the roof and floor, teeth edge
of my mouth—the salivate, sexy sensation—
my way of kissing the ring of English
for having crowned me English-speaking.
One evening last summer I spied the marsh
bellflower—dabs of blue amid chartreuse-
bright wild rice sprigs—two yards from
bursts of bur-marigold and rosy meadow rue,
and I’m still hunting for the uncommon
Hudson arrowhead, the cut-leaved
water horehound. However did a plant get hound
in its name? But I don’t want a pause for
etymological dreaming to halt the susurrate
and rattling runs of consonants, the shallow
and broad bellow of vowels, all that music
that, in trickles or rills or dips or blows,
trips the switch of this or that synapse:
the Wernicke and Broca areas of my
cerebral cortex flaring up like hydrogen
firestorms on the sun, my entire body
scintillate and quick with the gush-in,
flush-out, whisking blood.
from The Banquet: New & Selected Poems
GRAY JACOBIK is a widely-published, nationally-recognized American poet. A sought-after reader and mentor, she is an emerita professor of literature, a literary critic and painter, and a deeply committed advocate for the literary and visual arts.
Gray has been honored with numerous prestigious awards, including the William Meredith Award for Poetry for a collection entitled The Banquet: New and Selected Poems, in which Name Gourmand appears. She lives with her husband, Bruce Gregory, in Deep River, Connecticut.
Illustrations courtesy of the Connecticut River Museum
Well, if it’s May or June, it’s fresh shad! Indigenous to the East Coast from Newfoundland to Florida, American shad migrate from the salty Atlantic to fresh river waters to spawn. Its Latin name, Alosa Sapidissima, translates to “most savory shad” or “delicious herring,” which indeed it is. Shad’s unique flavor is both an acquired and sought after taste.
American Shad was first introduced to the settlers by the Native Americans and became a staple in their diet, and smoked shad is said to have saved Washington’s army from starvation during the harsh winter months.
In recent history, overfishing, developmental damming and environmental issues decreased the shad population. Today, shad is considered a delicacy, especially the female roe. Many local restaurants offer a variety of seasonal shad dishes served with indigenous vegetables including fiddlehead ferns. Shad roe is sometimes confused with caviar, which is typically from a sturgeon and has been brined. American shad roe is prepared primarily in its sac. If you are industrious, you can prepare many savory dishes at home. The challenge is removing the many minuscule bones. There are few folks left to do this tedious work, which has become a lost art, but you can trust your fish monger to get the job done. Mikmaq Indian folklore tells us that the shad was thought to be an “inside out porcupine!”
One of my favorite ways to enjoy shad is completely simple and can be, if creatively presented, an elegant hors d’oeuvre.
If you’re not up for trying shad at home, there are several community events that celebrate the shad including the Windsor Shad Derby and the Essex Shad Bake, both in Connecticut. So there’s no excuse to ignore this delicious Connecticut River fish.
MELODY TIERNEY is an avid foodie and has enjoyed sharing her passion with friends and family for many years. She and her husband, Phil, were also bed and breakfast owners in Southampton, New York, serving up a signature breakfast every morning. This and their gracious hospitality earned them Inn of the Month in Travel and Leisure magazine.
From the Forest
Fiddlehead Ferns
Wild edible fiddleheads are the coiled green shoots of ostrich ferns and are foraged from the forest floor April through early June, which makes for a timely pairing with shad and are also rich in omega-3 and 6 along with vitamins A and C, electrolytes, and several minerals. Note... Fiddleheads should be thoroughly washed and cooked...never eat them raw.
♦ Soak 2 cups of fiddleheads in cold water for a few minutes, trim ends, blanche in boiling water for 2 minutes and remove to coldwater bath.
♦ Pat dry and add to heated olive or butter and sauté gently for 5 minutes.
♦ Sprinkle with 1 tsp each of lemon juice and zest and a pinch of sea salt.
♦ Serve with shad and perhaps some creamy mashed potatoes.
Simply Sautéed Shad Roe for Two
Considered the “foie gras” of seafood, shad roe is also high in Omega-3 and 6 fatty acids...brain food!
♦ Season 2 lobes of shad roe with salt and pepper on both sides. Be gentle so as not to break sacs.
♦ Heat a pan over medium heat and add 1 TBS of butter and a dash of olive oil to evenly coat pan.
♦ Add thinly sliced garlic (3 cloves) and sauté until golden.
♦ Gently lay shad in pan and brown 3–5 minutes on each side until firm.
♦ Remove from pan and lower heat...add 1 TBS of butter and a handful of chopped parsley to garlic...stirring until parsley is soft.
♦ Squeeze in juice and add zest of ½ lemon or as desired.
♦ Add more butter or olive oil if needed.
♦ Spoon sauce over shad roe and serve!
Worth the Effort
Shad Roe with Bacon and Capers for Four
♦ Place 4 shad roe lobes in a baking pan and cover with 1½ cups of buttermilk... let sit for 1 hour.
♦ Sauté 6 slices of bacon until crisp. Drain and break into large pieces.
♦ Add 1 TBS of vegetable oil to bacon fat and warm to medium/high heat.
♦ Gently lift roe from buttermilk, dredge in salted flour, slip into skillet and cook approximately 3 minutes on each side until crispy and brown.
♦ Keep warm while making sauce.
♦ To skillet, add 3 TBS of capers, rinsed, drained, and chopped, and 2 TBS minced shallots.
♦ Cook over medium heat stirring for 1 minute.
♦ Stir in 1 TBS sherry vinegar and a handful of chopped parsley.
♦ Season with salt and pepper to taste and spoon over roe. Top with bacon and serve!
Simply Broiled Shad
♦ Prepare shad by checking and rechecking for any errant bones.
♦ Rub with olive oil, and salt and pepper to taste.
♦ Broil skin side down, 6 inches from broiler for 4–6 minutes.
♦ Serve warm or at room temperature on a white fish platter with a fresh herb garnish such as thyme, oregano or parley…whatever is handy.
♦ Serve with water crackers or crostini and let your guests help themselves!
Text and photos by Emily Dixon
A dreamed of trip becomes a reality— paddling down our Connecticut River
I know the mouth of the Connecticut River well. My commute between my parents’ houses was faster by water than car, crossing the channel from North Cove in Essex to head to the protected Lord’s Cove in Old Lyme. I grew up with osprey squawks, an occasional swimming deer, and telling the tide by the directions of the boats in the mooring fields. Years later at Smith College, I often saw the Connecticut River while biking, watching the ice flows in February with huge tree trunks fouling the pilings in April. I often thought about paddling my way downstream from college to home. There was never enough time until, five years later, the trip finally materialized.
This past summer, I canoed from Northampton, Massachusetts, to Long Island Sound with my partner, Connor O’Neill. We used The Connecticut River Boating Guide: Source to Sea by John Sinton, Elizabeth Farnsworth, and Wendy Sinton for our route and daily map. It fit perfectly into a gallon Ziploc and was perched on a dry bag throughout the trip. The trip was 92.5 miles, and we added a few slight detours to round it up to a 100 miler. This is my diary:
Day 1
Elwell Recreation Area → Brunelle’s Marina
Mileage: 7 miles
Elwell Recreation Area in Northampton, Massachusetts, in our trusty, blue 16’ Old Town fiberglass canoe, Mudbug, a common nickname for our favorite seafood snack, crawfish. After triple checking gear and finding the 35 perfect stow positions for various dry bags, we set off. With all our food and 20 liters of water, the gunnels seemed dangerously close to the wave tops at the protected boat launch. After a beautiful and uneventful short paddle, we arrived at Brunelle’s Marina.
Day 2
Brunelle’s Marina → Holyoke Rows
Mileage: 7.5 miles
Initially, excited to read in the guide books about the power company providing a shuttle service to paddlers to circumvent the Holyoke Dam. When our ride came in the morning, we chatted and decided that we would regret not doing the portage on foot. We pulled out at South Hadley Canoe Club and carried all of our equipment the one mile through Hadley to launch at Beachgrounds Park. While resting our tired backs at the South Hadley Public Library, we were offered a ride, which we also turned down. A little stubbornness got us a long way on this portage. The canoe over our heads was light as a feather compared to the heavy dry bags digging into our shoulders. After launching in the shallow water below the dam, we had a quick paddle to the community rowing and paddling organization, Holyoke Rows, to camp for the night. This was well timed because big thunderstorms rolled through that afternoon. We set up our tent on the club’s open porch and rode out the storms by cooking good food and napping in the hammock.
Day 3
Holyoke Rows → King’s Island
Mileage: 15.5 miles
Waking up to a clear sky, we launched Mudbug under the watchful eye of a beaver building his home under the floating dock. North of Springfield, Massachusetts, we spotted three large creatures hopping on the west bank of the River. As we paddled closer, we realized, to our delight, that the creatures were actually a family of bald eagles. We slipped by silently in our canoe, mesmerized by their beauty, size, and comedic antics. As we approached the Route I-91 bridge, we stuck to the east bank of the River knowing the breached dam, and subsequently the Enfield rapids, were ahead. The water picked up speed making its way around the initial structure of the old dam. Thinking we were safely below the dam and had avoided a second portage, we celebrated and moved confidently back into the middle of the River. Our revery was interrupted by the increasing low roar of falling water. We paddled furiously back to the safety of the east bank in time to navigate Mudbug over an eight inch drop. We breathed a sigh of relief, knowing the breached dam was now actually behind us; ahead lay King’s Island.
The campsite was located on the northeast side of the island. After setting up camp on one of the two tent platforms constructed with the help of the sports retailer, REI, we paddled to some smaller islands located close by. The smaller islands provided a great place to float in the current and drip dry in the setting sun.
Day 4
King’s Island → Island North of Route 291
Mileage: 13 miles
As we made our way south, the River widened; the water was fast and crystal clear. We paddled atop fields of eelgrass and hidden fish darting between the blades. Making our way closer and closer to Hartford, we decided to take a brief detour up the Farmington River for a midday hot dog at Bart’s. After struggling against the current, a hot dog loaded with sauerkraut and a tall root beer were a welcomed prize. We set up camp on an unnamed island located north of the Bissell Bridge. The island became quite busy with people fishing, jet skiers, and kids running around, all enjoying the River at sunset.
Day 5
Island N of Route 291 → River Highlands Park
Mileage: 17.5 miles
We started out early knowing we had many miles ahead of us. We were joined by the Hartford Riverfront Rowing Club as they rowed north and we paddled south. Filling up with potable water at the Hartford boat house, we stopped and enjoyed a breakfast snack with bustling Hartford in the background. South of Hartford, the scenery became more industrial with infrastructure for old barge traffic and a faint odor from local landfills. Reaching Crows Point, near the Glastonbury Boathouse, the River was wild once again, hosting lots of enthusiastic water skiers. By the time we reached River Highlands we were exhausted. After a lovely dinner on a riverside picnic table, we fell asleep while several owls hooted nearby.
Day 6
River Highlands → Chapman Pond
Mileage: 20.5 miles
Setting off in early morning fog, we were accompanied by great blue herons hunting for breakfast along the bank. They leapfrogged downriver as we glided past. As the day progressed and the River got deeper and wider, motorboat and jet ski traffic increased. We tied up our boat at the Blue Oar in Haddam, Connecticut, for a well earned hamburger.
Our boat was the smallest and dirtiest on the dock. As we entered the restaurant, it became clear by our appearance (and our smell) that we had been traveling for some time.
After waving goodbye, we continued past the Goodspeed Opera House on the eastern shore. The entrance to Chapman Pond was barely discernible behind a group of small islands covered by small motorboats. As we passed through the narrow entrance, the pond opened up before us. We noticed a small break in the bank’s brush indicating a campsite nearby. A short walk up the hill were two tent platforms in an open wooded area with views of the pond below. After setting up camp, we paddled back out for a refreshing River swim and boat wash. A slight breeze at the site made for a wonderfully bug free night.
Day 7
Chapman Pond → Long Island Sound
Mileage: 14.5 miles
Waking up with several people fishing in the pond, we made our way south observing many osprey along the way. As we neared Gillette Castle, the ferry was dutifully making its trips back and forth across the River amongst fish leaping out of the water. We turned east into Selden Creek, following the marshy waters and enjoying the peaceful respite from motorboat wakes. A brief stop in downtown Essex, where we fueled on our first coffee in a week, gave us the push we needed to make it to the sound. We battled large waves near the gas dock on the east bank at the railroad bridge before tucking into the end of the Lieutenant River for the final stretch through the marsh creeks leading to the Sound. We passed crabbers and paddle boarders along the twists and turns before the current picked up and soon we were in the Sound. We were amazed at how shallow the water was at Griswold Point and ceremoniously dipped our last smoked pepperoni stick into the water for a celebratory bite, our journey having come to a close.
……………………………………………………
The paddle down the River displayed the wide range of life the River supports, from abundant wildlife to the industrial Springfield skyline to happy shrieks emanating from the rides at Six Flags. This trip would not have been possible without the help and support of our parents. Collectively, they took care of our dog, drove us to our launch, stored our gear, and towed us back from the Sound. The food was plentiful from homemade cookies to mid-trip burgers, and the finale on the grill; we are grateful.
"These bird losses are a strong signal that our human-altered landscapes are losing their ability to support birdlife."
–Ken Rosenberg, Cornell’s conservation scientist
One of us visited the heart of the Soviet Union during its latter days and was struck by the absence of birds in general, and certainly the absence of avian variety. Among the major differences between the USSR and North America was the lack of proven, sensible environmental laws and regulations governing such things as pesticides, hedgerow preservation, and land use in the Soviet Union. This fall, scientists at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology spearheaded a sobering report, “Decline of the North American Avifauna,” Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw1313 (2019), that forces us to moderate our pride in environmental regulations at home. The 11 authors, from government agencies and NGOs across the US and Canada, analyzed data collected over 50 years from a suite of A Rude Awakening and Call to Action governmental and citizen science programs. They found that the number of birds in North America has declined by nearly one third, or a loss of 2.9 billion birds, since 1970. According to Cornell’s conservation scientist, Ken Rosenberg, “These bird losses are a strong signal that our human-altered landscapes are losing their ability to support birdlife.”
The study raises at least two important questions of interest to those of us who live in the Connecticut River Watershed: First, which of our local birds are declining in number? The study says that grassland birds such as bobolinks have declined by more than 50%, and that more than 90% of the bird losses are from just twelve bird families such as sparrows, finches, and swallows. Redwinged Blackbirds, abundant within the CT River Valley, have declined on the North American continent from 260 million 50 years ago to 170 million today.
In terms of what each of us non-farmers can do to stem this decline, we should keep our cats indoors, make our windows bird-friendly, and support our local conservation groups. In coming issues, we will have more to say about this, but for now, let’s cherish what we have and work hard to better share this planet with all its creatures.
David Winkler
Professor in the Department of Ecology and
Evolutionary Biology at Cornell University
and Curator of Ornithology at
Cornell’s Museum of Vertebrates
Dick Shriver
Publisher
By Bill Hobbs
“I'm not a criminal,”
said Paddington.
“I'm a bear!”― Michael Bond, A Bear Called Paddington
As black bear populations continue to grow in the Connecticut River Valley and beyond, now more than ever there’s a need for people and public officials to work together to sustain a healthy bear population.
The road to coexistence with black bears, however, is not an easy one. Ask residents in wildlife areas who have lived near cougars or wolves and they’ll tell you how difficult it can be.
Connecticut has the smallest black bear population in New England—about 800. Yet, the state has among the fastest growing populations, increasing 10–15 percent per year. “Their geographic range is expanding and so hasn’t our involvement,” explained Paul Rego, wildlife biologist for Connecticut’s Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. “Our biggest concern [now] is bear conflict,” said Rego.
In 2019, Rego said black bears broke into 20 or more Connecticut homes. If a bear damages fruit trees, crops, livestock, or personal property, Rego said officials will trap the offending bear, ear tag it for monitoring purposes, and put the animal through a negative experience like using loud noises, before releasing it back into the wild.
The practice is called “aversive conditioning” and is designed to modify the bear’s behavior and teach it to avoid specific places. The practice has mixed results. Rego said offending bears are rarely relocated. The reason why is because bears have a “very strong homing instinct,” often returning to the same spot. Further, the department can’t move bears out of the state because no state will allow it.
Rego’s colleagues in New Hampshire, Vermont, and Massachusetts, other states that border the Connecticut River Valley, face similar challenges.
“Educating the public on bear-human conflicts is a significant priority for our department, and we spend substantial time on it” distributing brochures, giving lectures, broadcasting radio announcements, and issuing press releases, said Andrew Timmins, bear project leader for New Hampshire’s Fish and Game Department.
Timmins said New Hampshire, a state that flanks the Connecticut River for over 140 miles, has a bear population of 5,600, one of the largest in New England, growing at two percent per year. Elsewhere, Forrest Hammond, black bear project leader for Vermont’s Fish and Wildlife Department, said game wardens and his staff field “daily inquiries” from the public about how to deal with bears. In addition, Dave Wattles, black bear and furbearer biologist for the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, said his office tries to “educate the public to change their behavior” and do simple things like secure their garbage.
“Bears aren’t going to change,” Wattles said. “They’re driven by food.”
So, what can the public do to help mitigate bear-human conflicts?
In short, have an offense and be responsible if you have bears in your area, officials urge. Take down your bird feeders if bears have robbed them and keep them down. Don’t throw food scraps in your compost heap, and consider putting electric fences up around chicken coops and beehives, if you own them. “Bears learn that chickens and beehives are easy meals,” Wattles said.
Finally, what should you do if you encounter a black bear? Though it may be almost impossible to do, remain calm.
If the bear is aware of you and does not flee, experts urge you to stand erect and talk to the bear in a calm voice and back away slowly. They also caution you to never run or climb a tree. Why? Black bears can sprint up to 35 miles per hour and are excellent tree climbers.
“If the bear approaches, be offensive. Make more noise, wave your arms, and throw objects at the bear,” the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection website advises. “Black bears rarely attack humans. But, if you are attacked, do not play dead. Fight back with anything available.”
While our state officials are doing their level best to manage a growing black bear population, we need to do our share, and be mindful of these big animals, and do easy things like securing all potential food sources and keeping our pets inside at night.
“In my mind, their loss would be a terrible thing if we didn’t learn to live together,” said Wattles.
Bill Hobbs is a nature columnist for The Day in New London, CT. He is a resident of Stonington and lifelong wildlife enthusiast. For comments, he can be reached at whobbs246@gmail.com.
Getty Images, twigymuleford
♦ Ferry Landing State Park
♦ Great Island Boat Launch
By Frank Gallo | Wesleyan University Press
<h5>Ferry Landing State Park</h5>
Seasonal Rating: Sp *** Su *** F **** W ***
Best Time to Bird: Year-round
Habitat: Freshwater marsh, tidal wetlands, tidal rivers,
intertidal mudflats, thickets, coastal forest, boardwalk,
lawns, picnic area
Bird List for this Site: https://qr-creator.com/r/HgogrV
Specialty Birds
Resident: Mute Swan, Bald Eagle, Belted Kingfisher, Fish Crow
Summer: Green Heron (uncommon), Snowy and Great Egrets, Black Vulture, Osprey, Willow Flycatcher, Marsh Wren, Warbling Vireo
Winter: American Black Duck, Gadwall, Green-winged Teal, Great Cormorant (uncommon), Rough-legged Hawk (invasion years), Winter Wren, kinglets (some winters), Hermit Thrush, Brown Thrasher (uncommon); AmericanTree, Field, Fox, White-crowned, and Swamp Sparrows
Other Key Birds
Summer: Black-Crowned Night-Heron, Double-crested Cormorant; Rough- winged, Tree, and Barn Swallows; House Wren, Cedar Waxwing, Common Yellowthroat, Yellow Warbler, Chipping Sparrow
Winter: Loons, grebes, Yellow-rumped Warbler, Pine Siskin (invasion years), Purple Finch (some years)
Migrants Scaup (spring), Bufflehead, Common Goldeneye (spring), mergansers (spring), American Bittern (late fall), Eastern Towhee, Savannah Sparrow and other sparrows, thicketloving species, Rusty Blackbird (fall; uncommon)
Location: 398 Ferry Road, Old Lyme
Restrooms: On site (closed in winter)
Additional Information: The park is open from sunrise to sunset. The Connecticut DEEP Marine Fisheries office at 333 Ferry Road is open weekdays from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Some areas are wheelchair accessible.
The Birding
Ferry Landing Park is a small coastal preserve only a few minutes from I-95 that allows wonderful views of the lower Connecticut and Lieutenant Rivers and their wildlife-rich marsh complex. It is known locally as a place to find waders in summer and landbird migrants, especially in fall; it often holds thicket-loving species fall through spring.
How to Bird This Site
A 300-yard boardwalk on the park’s southwest side leads south along the Connecticut River, passes under a railroad trestle, and ends at a raised platform overlooking the extensive tidal marshes and mudflats at the mouth of the Lieutenant River. Great Island, Saybrook Point, and the two Saybrook lighthouses can be seen to the south. This lovely boardwalk provides opportunities to view a wide variety of marsh- and water-birds throughout the year. In summer, watch for Clapper Rail, egrets, Green Heron and other herons, Glossy Ibis (uncommon), and shorebirds. American Bittern has been found in fall. Ospreys are abundant in summer, Rough-legged Hawks visit in some winters, and resident Bald Eagles frequent the area year-round. Loons, grebes—including the occasional Red-necked Grebe—and a wide variety of ducks can be seen fall through spring. Great Cormorant occur in winter, and Double-crested Cormorant in summer. Northern Rough-winged, Tree, and Barn Swallows are common spring through fall.
Seasonal Rating: Sp ** Su *** F *** W ***
Location: 98 Town Landing Road, Old Lyme
Restrooms: Portable toilet on site
The Birding
The observation platform at the Great Island boat launch looks across to the Great Island marsh. The Great Island area, near the confluence of the Connecticut and Black Hall Rivers, is especially good for finding Osprey, Clapper Rail, waders, shorebirds—including nesting Willet and the occasional Whimbrel (uncommon)—Common and Least Terns, and Saltmarsh and Seaside Sparrows in summer. Spotted Sandpipers are fairly common nesters, while American Oystercatchers and Piping Plovers breed locally. American Bittern (uncommon) occurs in fall. It is also quite reliable for raptors in winter, especially Northern Harrier, Bald Eagle, and Rough-legged Hawk (in invasion years). Search for Short-eared Owl (uncommon) at dusk, especially in fall, and for Snowy Owl in winter. A variety of ducks frequent the area late fall into spring. Migrant landbirds drop into the trees along Town Landing Road, especially in fall, and the adjacent fields are worth checking for Eastern Meadowlark, American Pipit, and possibly Lapland Longspur or Snow Bunting, especially in winter.
How to Bird This Site
A scope is needed here, as Great Island is fairly distant. To check the fields, park by the platform, then walk back up the road.
Frank Gallo is author of the book Birding in Connecticut, published in 2018 by Wesleyan Press. This section of Mr. Gallo’s book is reproduced here, edited for Estuary, with permission of Mr. Gallo and Wesleyan Press. You can find this book at www.hfsbooks.com/books/birding-in-connecticut-gallo/
By Eleanor Robinson
Image Credit: Kris Rowe
During the month of March, the onset of spring in New England is revealed by the arrival of a conspicuous coastal and estuarine raptor—the Osprey. It may be blowing hard on Connecticut salt marshes with temperatures hovering in the 40s, but for Osprey, this time is ripe for reproduction.
Just when winter is feeling too long, and cooped up New Englanders are suffering from weather-induced grouchiness, this magnificent flyer returns from South America to dazzle us. The return of the Osprey and everything about the subsequent nesting season is “bird TV.” Ospreys put on a show on the sometimes snowy March shoreline as we await the release of the brutal grip of winter.
If you are fortunate enough to care for a child or a grandchild, the possibility of a late March Osprey sighting is an excuse for a foray outdoors, to observe the shift in seasons and to witness the wonder of nature. Ospreys can be helpful as nature’s gateway bird to some 2nd or 3rd generational fun outside. Ospreys are low hanging fruit for environmental education. Ospreys are large and exciting birds. They are often heard before seen. While they perform their “sky dance” flights they sound off with bracing, high-pitched calls to announce themselves to intruders or to garner attention in courtship. In Ospreyspeak, they are announcing, “See me here, this is my nest, and she is my mate.”
Ospreys mate for life but migrate and spend their winter “vacation” separately. During the breeding season, the males rise up some 30 feet above the water, hover in place for better focus on the fish below, and perform spectacular plunge dives 8–10 times a day, to secure enough fish for themselves, their female mates, and eventually, their young. Females do not catch any fish for nearly 5 months while they are in their nesting and motherhood phase. Ospreys coexist with humans unusually easily, preferring to erect their impressive stick nests on structures like man-made platforms, ship masts, electrical poles, cell towers, and bell buoys. The nesting cycle can be witnessed in full view from the shoreline or from a boat. Taking time to sit on the shoreline and simply observe the ancestral benchmarks of fish hawk reproduction is a treat for any age.
Osprey drawing from Getty Images, Andrew Howe
With a child at your side, there are many entry points to begin the process of inquiry and excitement. Adults can set the stage for anticipation. Guess the date of the first Osprey sighting. Hint: male birds almost always return first to Connecticut coastal marshes March 19–24. That is a good time to set up an Osprey calendar. Become a nature detective and witness nest site selection, courtship, nest building, incubation, chick emergence, fledging, and migration. Observe it, track it and have fun! Identify one or more nest platforms to adopt and return to as often as possible to take mental or real field notes with photography, drawings, and written descriptions of breeding bird behavior. It helps that Ospreys prefer to remain loyal to their particular nest year after year, which has the advantage that the work of nest building is already accomplished but with considerable repair work often necessary after the ravages of winter.
When the females return a few days later, suddenly there will be two active birds virtually tethered to the platform. For the most part, the soon-to-be Dad birds will be busy gathering hefty sticks, one at time, to build or enhance their nests. Children can scatter large sticks on the ground nearby for the Osprey to snatch up on their homebuilding forays. It won’t be long before egg-laying occurs in early May and two to three chicks pop up above the mass of woven sticks five weeks later. Hunting and fish delivery activity are now in full force with downy chicks ravenous for protein. After about 50 days of watching and waiting in the nest, young Ospreys with sturdier feathers are nourished enough with a diet of daily fish that they attempt their first awkward flights, just like children with their first steps. Once the young are independent and airborne, Mom Osprey leaves the roost to regain strength and head south. Meanwhile, Dad Osprey continues his fish forays back and forth from the nest to supplement the diet of his fledglings. Neither parent teaches their offspring to hunt fish, which becomes an inefficient trial and error survival test for each fledgling. By early September, our Connecticut River Ospreys start heading south with the first-year birds trailing in the subsequent weeks. It is probable that this family group will never be united again. They disperse on their own and fly solo over 3,000 miles south on an epic and arduous monthlong migration. They have strong memories for the visual cues of stopover feeding areas and usually forage along the Atlantic coastline, Haiti, and Cuba before ultimately reaching South America, often as far as the Amazon Basin. Satellite transmitters placed on migrating Ospreys show that they navigate these long distances with uncanny precision, especially when travelling over open water like the Caribbean Sea. They never rest on open water, perhaps orienting to varying intensities of earth’s magnetic fields. Scientists also project that Ospreys use the position of the sun and stars as navigational aids.
Observing Osprey breeding season events from chilly March until balmy September is to witness about as clearly as humanly possible, the primordial cycle of life, as seen through the lens of an iconic and dramatic estuary bird. Happy Osprey-ing!
Eleanor Robinson grew up on the shores of Long Island Sound in the neighborhood of the Cold Spring Harbor Biological Laboratory and was indelibly influenced by the nearby estuary and sand spit as well as the lectures and programs of lab scientists and educators.
She graduated from the University of Washington in Seattle where she was a work/study student with jobs including field work for the University’s Burke Museum of Natural History, the Provincial Museum of British Columbia, and for a PhD student writing the Catalogue of Washington Seabird Colonies.
Eleanor earned a Master’s degree in Science Journalism and a graduate certificate in nonprofit management. She has worked as a teacher and writer for Tabor Academy, the Massachusetts Audubon Society, the Denison Pequot Nature Center, and the Science Center of Eastern Connecticut. Her most recent position was that of founding director of Connecticut Audubon’s Roger Tory Peterson Estuary Center serving Southeastern Connecticut and focused on the Connecticut River Estuary.
Some Osprey trivia to share at strategic times with a young one at your side:
♦ Osprey females are significantly larger than males.
♦ Ospreys are the only raptor that feed completely on a diet of live fish.
♦ Ospreys mate for life and return to their nest site year after year
♦ Ospreys are a global species and nest from Australia to Japan, Europe to Canada and the USA
♦ Ospreys are one of the few large birds that hover
♦ Ospreys have naked legs and especially long, curved and sharp talons. The bottom of their feet are covered with rough spines—all adaptations for seizing fish.
♦ Osprey adult birds have a yellow iris. Younger birds have orange-red eyes.
P.S. For more information and enjoyment, learn more through the Connecticut Audubon Society Osprey Nation program. View the live stream Osprey Nation “Osprey cam” on the nest. Maybe you and your family members will be motivated to become official Connecticut Audubon Osprey Stewards. Check out the migratory routes of individual Ospreys equipped with transmitters and tracked by satellite on Rob Bierregaard’s website ospreytrax.com and described in his children’s book, Belle’s Journey. Also recommended is the recently published book of Dr. Alan Poole, Ospreys, the Revival of a Global Raptor.
♦ Ferry Landing State Park
♦ Great Island Boat Launch
By Frank Gallo | Wesleyan University Press
<h5>Ferry Landing State Park</h5>
Seasonal Rating: Sp *** Su *** F **** W ***
Best Time to Bird: Year-round
Habitat: Freshwater marsh, tidal wetlands, tidal rivers,
intertidal mudflats, thickets, coastal forest, boardwalk,
lawns, picnic area
Bird List for this Site: https://qr-creator.com/r/HgogrV
Specialty Birds
Resident: Mute Swan, Bald Eagle, Belted Kingfisher, Fish Crow
Summer: Green Heron (uncommon), Snowy and Great Egrets, Black Vulture, Osprey, Willow Flycatcher, Marsh Wren, Warbling Vireo
Winter: American Black Duck, Gadwall, Green-winged Teal, Great Cormorant (uncommon), Rough-legged Hawk (invasion years), Winter Wren, kinglets (some winters), Hermit Thrush, Brown Thrasher (uncommon); AmericanTree, Field, Fox, White-crowned, and Swamp Sparrows
Other Key Birds
Summer: Black-Crowned Night-Heron, Double-crested Cormorant; Rough- winged, Tree, and Barn Swallows; House Wren, Cedar Waxwing, Common Yellowthroat, Yellow Warbler, Chipping Sparrow
Winter: Loons, grebes, Yellow-rumped Warbler, Pine Siskin (invasion years), Purple Finch (some years)
Migrants Scaup (spring), Bufflehead, Common Goldeneye (spring), mergansers (spring), American Bittern (late fall), Eastern Towhee, Savannah Sparrow and other sparrows, thicketloving species, Rusty Blackbird (fall; uncommon)
Location: 398 Ferry Road, Old Lyme
Restrooms: On site (closed in winter)
Additional Information: The park is open from sunrise to sunset. The Connecticut DEEP Marine Fisheries office at 333 Ferry Road is open weekdays from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Some areas are wheelchair accessible.
The Birding
Ferry Landing Park is a small coastal preserve only a few minutes from I-95 that allows wonderful views of the lower Connecticut and Lieutenant Rivers and their wildlife-rich marsh complex. It is known locally as a place to find waders in summer and landbird migrants, especially in fall; it often holds thicket-loving species fall through spring.
How to Bird This Site
A 300-yard boardwalk on the park’s southwest side leads south along the Connecticut River, passes under a railroad trestle, and ends at a raised platform overlooking the extensive tidal marshes and mudflats at the mouth of the Lieutenant River. Great Island, Saybrook Point, and the two Saybrook lighthouses can be seen to the south. This lovely boardwalk provides opportunities to view a wide variety of marsh- and water-birds throughout the year. In summer, watch for Clapper Rail, egrets, Green Heron and other herons, Glossy Ibis (uncommon), and shorebirds. American Bittern has been found in fall. Ospreys are abundant in summer, Rough-legged Hawks visit in some winters, and resident Bald Eagles frequent the area year-round. Loons, grebes—including the occasional Red-necked Grebe—and a wide variety of ducks can be seen fall through spring. Great Cormorant occur in winter, and Double-crested Cormorant in summer. Northern Rough-winged, Tree, and Barn Swallows are common spring through fall.
Seasonal Rating: Sp ** Su *** F *** W ***
Location: 98 Town Landing Road, Old Lyme
Restrooms: Portable toilet on site
The Birding
The observation platform at the Great Island boat launch looks across to the Great Island marsh. The Great Island area, near the confluence of the Connecticut and Black Hall Rivers, is especially good for finding Osprey, Clapper Rail, waders, shorebirds—including nesting Willet and the occasional Whimbrel (uncommon)—Common and Least Terns, and Saltmarsh and Seaside Sparrows in summer. Spotted Sandpipers are fairly common nesters, while American Oystercatchers and Piping Plovers breed locally. American Bittern (uncommon) occurs in fall. It is also quite reliable for raptors in winter, especially Northern Harrier, Bald Eagle, and Rough-legged Hawk (in invasion years). Search for Short-eared Owl (uncommon) at dusk, especially in fall, and for Snowy Owl in winter. A variety of ducks frequent the area late fall into spring. Migrant landbirds drop into the trees along Town Landing Road, especially in fall, and the adjacent fields are worth checking for Eastern Meadowlark, American Pipit, and possibly Lapland Longspur or Snow Bunting, especially in winter.
How to Bird This Site
A scope is needed here, as Great Island is fairly distant. To check the fields, park by the platform, then walk back up the road.
Frank Gallo is author of the book Birding in Connecticut, published in 2018 by Wesleyan Press. This section of Mr. Gallo’s book is reproduced here, edited for Estuary, with permission of Mr. Gallo and Wesleyan Press. You can find this book at www.hfsbooks.com/books/birding-in-connecticut-gallo/
Photograph by Jody Dole
That’s Andy Fisk’s goal, and not just a dream, for the Connecticut River. Fisk, a patient, persistent, articulate scientist, is executive director of the Connecticut River Conservancy, a water-shed scale conservation organization based in Greenfield, Massachusetts. He can take water samples in the morning and debate experts on water quality policy in the afternoon. Fisk is among those who comprehend the arduous journey from water testing to legislation based on those tests, with a lag time of 5, 10 or even 15 years. Good, sound, effective water policy development must therefore necessarily survive multi-generations of elected officials in governors’ mansions as well as the White House.
A brief history of the environmental movement at the federal level bears repeating. Public opinion regarding air and water pollution was largely shaped by Rachel Carson’s book, Silent Spring, published in 1962, and sensationalized catastrophes such as the 1969 fire on the Cuyahoga River in Ohio. In 1970, President Richard Nixon brought the Environmental Protection Agency into being with William Ruckleshaus as its first head. Ruckleshaus noted that, “public opinion remains absolutely essential for anything to be done onbehalf of the environment.”
The Clean Water Act of 1972 brought voluntary standards for discharges of pollutants into navigable inland waterways. President Jimmy Carter’s EPA administrator, Douglas M. Costle, who had also led the study in the late 1960s that recommended the creation of the EPA and in 1975 was Connecticut’s Commissioner of Environmental Protection, championed the Clean Water Act (as amended) of 1977. This act outlawed the use of any pipe or man-made ditch for discharges into navigable waters. The law also required industry to meet “best technological standards” for specified pollutants with a deadline for compliance of 1984. “Voluntary compliance” was replaced with “mandatory compliance with penalties.”
The die was cast. Industries, farms, and individuals made the necessary investments. The Connecticut River rose from a Class D (basically, dirty and unsanitary) River to a Class B River, which it is today. Fish and people were able to swim in their rivers once again. So, is the battle over? Is clean water here to stay? Not if one believed Ruckleshaus in 1972: “…the environment is a problem you must tend to everlastingly. It doesn’t go away. It’s not like putting out a fire or even building a highway. You can’t do it, then brush your hands and say, ‘On to the next task.’ You have to keep at it all the time; otherwise it starts to slide back.”
Sliding backwards may include acute problems such as bacteria caused by a leak or a broken pipe. Once detected today, however, such impairments are rectified and clean water is restored rather quickly.
The battle’s not over if you’re Andy Fisk, either. Fisk looks to the day when the Connecticut River is “clean, healthy, and full of life.” Just because it’s clean doesn’t mean it’s healthy, says Fisk. “Nevertheless, fish, wildlife, and plants will flourish in and along a healthy river. The goal is that decades from now, we could see the return of millions of blue-back herring, alewives, and shad.”
A river that is “clean, healthy, and full of life” would seem to be in everyone’s best interests. Fisk says work on “healthy” began 20 years ago involving matters such as storm water, nutrient control, and even the depth to which sunlight penetrates the water. The way forward is somewhat more complex, however.
The Clean Water Act has enabled the River to get to “clean” but falls short of helping to restore large populations of fish and desirable aquatic plant life. Now, says Fisk, the CWA must be married with various state wildlife conservation laws to get to “healthy.”
For the way forward, complex interdependencies become more important than simpler dependencies; dependencies such as, “the more dissolved oxygen in the water, the better it is for trout.” As an example of interdependencies, clearer water lets in more sunlight. Sunlight to greater depths allows more eelgrass to grow. Eelgrass is used by fish such as trout to spawn and is used by their young for protection. Therefore, more sunlight to greater depths is good for trout.
In addition, important balances must be maintained. Not all nutrients, nitrogen and phosphorous are bad, for example; they must be managed, however, to reach an optimum balance.
Technology is also a factor. If a subject can’t be measured far and wide and inexpensively then causal relationships cannot be substantiated and used in arguments for conservation policies. According to Fisk, relevant new technological developments will play an important role in showing the way to a river full of life.
Habitat and ecology issues also surface, with conservation advocates taking different positions on the same object in different regions. For example, the parasitic sea lampreys are viewed as undesirable in certain regions, but desirable in others, with both directions based on sound eco-logic. In Connecticut, for example, the state is aiding and abetting the growth of the lamprey population by stocking them upriver, and by providing access to their spawning sites above dams. As noted on the Connecticut River Conservancy website, “adult lampreys are an important source of nutrients for our rivers. After they’re born here in the Connecticut River, they head out into the oceans to live and grow. Once full grown, they migrate back to our rivers to spawn. After they lay their eggs, they all die. Their bodies become a food source for all sorts of other river life including aquatic insects, fish, and mammals. Lampreys support a vast food chain that keeps our rivers healthy and full of life.”
One gets the impression that the road to a clean and healthy River full of life will rely more upon persuasion than upon coercion. Andy Fisk seems primed for the task.
Prior to joining the Connecticut River Conservancy as Executive Director in 2011, Dr. Fisk served as Director of the Land and Water Quality Bureau at the Maine Department of Environmental Protection for seven years. As Maine’s land and water quality director, Fisk had extensive experience with a range of state and federal environmental quality statutes.
Dr. Fisk has a Ph.D. in Environmental Sciences, as well as a master’s degree in City and Regional Planning from Rutgers University. He has served as President of the Association of State and Interstate Water Pollution Control Agencies and Chair of the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission (NEIWPCC). He has been active in land conservation for over a decade. At NEIWPCC, Fisk initiated the country’s first regional mercury clean-up plan for the seven Northeast states’ impaired waters, which maps out strategies to make the region’s fish safe to eat. Dr. Fisk is a member of Estuary magazine’s editorial advisory board.
By Bill Hobbs
“I'm not a criminal,”
said Paddington.
“I'm a bear!”― Michael Bond, A Bear Called Paddington
As black bear populations continue to grow in the Connecticut River Valley and beyond, now more than ever there’s a need for people and public officials to work together to sustain a healthy bear population.
The road to coexistence with black bears, however, is not an easy one. Ask residents in wildlife areas who have lived near cougars or wolves and they’ll tell you how difficult it can be.
Connecticut has the smallest black bear population in New England—about 800. Yet, the state has among the fastest growing populations, increasing 10–15 percent per year. “Their geographic range is expanding and so hasn’t our involvement,” explained Paul Rego, wildlife biologist for Connecticut’s Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. “Our biggest concern [now] is bear conflict,” said Rego.
In 2019, Rego said black bears broke into 20 or more Connecticut homes. If a bear damages fruit trees, crops, livestock, or personal property, Rego said officials will trap the offending bear, ear tag it for monitoring purposes, and put the animal through a negative experience like using loud noises, before releasing it back into the wild.
The practice is called “aversive conditioning” and is designed to modify the bear’s behavior and teach it to avoid specific places. The practice has mixed results. Rego said offending bears are rarely relocated. The reason why is because bears have a “very strong homing instinct,” often returning to the same spot. Further, the department can’t move bears out of the state because no state will allow it.
Rego’s colleagues in New Hampshire, Vermont, and Massachusetts, other states that border the Connecticut River Valley, face similar challenges.
“Educating the public on bear-human conflicts is a significant priority for our department, and we spend substantial time on it” distributing brochures, giving lectures, broadcasting radio announcements, and issuing press releases, said Andrew Timmins, bear project leader for New Hampshire’s Fish and Game Department.
Timmins said New Hampshire, a state that flanks the Connecticut River for over 140 miles, has a bear population of 5,600, one of the largest in New England, growing at two percent per year. Elsewhere, Forrest Hammond, black bear project leader for Vermont’s Fish and Wildlife Department, said game wardens and his staff field “daily inquiries” from the public about how to deal with bears. In addition, Dave Wattles, black bear and furbearer biologist for the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, said his office tries to “educate the public to change their behavior” and do simple things like secure their garbage.
“Bears aren’t going to change,” Wattles said. “They’re driven by food.”
So, what can the public do to help mitigate bear-human conflicts?
In short, have an offense and be responsible if you have bears in your area, officials urge. Take down your bird feeders if bears have robbed them and keep them down. Don’t throw food scraps in your compost heap, and consider putting electric fences up around chicken coops and beehives, if you own them. “Bears learn that chickens and beehives are easy meals,” Wattles said.
Finally, what should you do if you encounter a black bear? Though it may be almost impossible to do, remain calm.
If the bear is aware of you and does not flee, experts urge you to stand erect and talk to the bear in a calm voice and back away slowly. They also caution you to never run or climb a tree. Why? Black bears can sprint up to 35 miles per hour and are excellent tree climbers.
“If the bear approaches, be offensive. Make more noise, wave your arms, and throw objects at the bear,” the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection website advises. “Black bears rarely attack humans. But, if you are attacked, do not play dead. Fight back with anything available.”
While our state officials are doing their level best to manage a growing black bear population, we need to do our share, and be mindful of these big animals, and do easy things like securing all potential food sources and keeping our pets inside at night.
“In my mind, their loss would be a terrible thing if we didn’t learn to live together,” said Wattles.
Bill Hobbs is a nature columnist for The Day in New London, CT. He is a resident of Stonington and lifelong wildlife enthusiast. For comments, he can be reached at whobbs246@gmail.com.
Getty Images, twigymuleford
By Bill Hobbs
Photography by Chris Zajac
People who enjoy the Fannie Stebbins Refuge can hike along its easy, wide trails and see a beautiful mosaic of pristine wetlands, ponds, meadows, and floodplain forest.
Alongside the Connecticut River, just a few miles south of Springfield, Massachusetts, is a 371-acre environmental success story, a jewel of a refuge, called the Fannie Stebbins Memorial Wildlife Refuge that will be a safe-haven for wildlife for generations to come.
This is a story about caring and tenacious residents and organizations, including a distinguished bird club, The Nature Conservancy, the town of Longmeadow, and two federal agencies. Together they forged innovative partnerships to raise money and manpower to reduce invasive plants on the refuge and reforest five old hay fields with 7,900 native tree seedlings, shrubs and ferns, creating the largest reforested floodplain on the Connecticut River.
After completing an extensive restoration project, The Nature Conservancy will transfer the Stebbins property to the Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge, reaching their collective goal and safeguarding its future.
The 244-acre restoration area will be part of the US Fish & Wildlife-managed Conte Refuge’s four-state network of protected lands. These protected lands now total about 38,000 acres.
The Conte Refuge was created in 1997 to protect the entire watershed of the Connecticut River. Parts of the refuge extend into Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut, including many creeks, streams, and tributaries.
People who enjoy the Fannie Stebbins Refuge can hike along its easy, wide trails and see a beautiful mosaic of pristine wetlands, ponds, meadows, and floodplain forest.
“It’s so peaceful, you really are immersed in nature,”
“It’s so peaceful, you really are immersed in nature,” said Cynthia Sommers, president of The Friends of Fannie Stebbins, an oversite group under the Conte refuge.
The Stebbins Refuge is home to nesting wood ducks, rare red-headed woodpeckers, numerous migrating birds, owls, hawks, an occasional bald eagle, including deer, coyote, bobcats, beaver, and river otters, to name a few species.
Enjoyed by hikers, birders, and photographers, alike, this newest addition to the Conte Refuge is the result of many caring women and men, who for over 70 years, endeavored to protect and preserve the property, and did.
One of the early champions of the Fannie Stebbins refuge was Kate Hale (formerly Kate Leary), a retired teacher and avid birder. “My love and appreciation for ‘Stebbins’ grew first from birding there with the Allen Bird Club, whose members began purchasing pieces of land and weaving them together in the early 1950s, to establish the Fannie Stebbins Memorial Wildlife Refuge,” Hale explained in an email.
The Allen Bird Club that Hale mentions is the oldest continually operating bird club in Massachusetts. It was co-founded by Fannie Stebbins, who the refuge was later named after, and Grace Johnson on January 8, 1912. Fannie Adelle Stebbins (1858–1949) was herself a colorful person. Not only was she the supervisor of Springfield’s Elementary School Sciences, but a respected birder.
In 1926, for example, Stebbins made the first regional sighting—rare then—of a glossy ibis. And in 1932, she recorded the second sighting in Massachusetts of a scissor-tailed flycatcher, a bird commonly found in Southwestern deserts.
After Stebbins passed, members of the Allen Bird Club named the refuge in her memory.
Hale, meanwhile, in the early 2000s, began to be concerned about the spread of invasive plants on the Stebbins property. She had taken classes from the New England Wildflower Society in Framingham, Massachusetts, and learned how native plants play a key role in blooming and attracting insects for migrating birds moving north in the spring, and fruiting for birds traveling south in autumn.
She also learned how exotic invasive plants, like Japanese knotweed, multiflora rose, bittersweet, barberry, and stiltweed can severely threaten native flora and fauna in preserves like Stebbins.
Hale made it her “personal mission” to put the Stebbins land under the care of a larger entity that would protect it in perpetuity.
In the spring of 2015, the Allen Bird Club formed a committee of five volunteers. They included Ray Burk, David Miller, Judy and Dudley Williams, and Hale. One of the first organizations they approached was The Nature Conservancy (TNC).
Markelle Smith, landscape partnership manager for TNC’s Massachusetts Chapter and Andrew French, project leader for the Conte Refuge, toured the refuge and liked it, setting negotiations and a two to three-year restoration plan in motion.
Important pieces to the success of the restoration included several actions from major organizations.
For example, AMTRAK, which had a rail line running through part of the refuge, agreed to install signal lights and gates at a crossing on the north end. The town of Longmeadow, which owns conservation lands abutting the Stebbins property, repaved one of the access roads, graveled in a trailhead entrance, and leased a small parcel of land to USFWS to allow them to build a raised platform, ADA accessible, for outdoor classrooms and public viewing of the wetlands.
"This is a positive model for future environmental projects.”
Steve Crane, Longmeadow’s town manager noted, “We wanted to make sure our amenity is a benefit to our residents, and it is with this refuge.”
Finally, The Nature Conservancy and US Fish & Wildlife Service devised a plan to reduce the number of invasive plants, strip five old hay fields down to bare earth and reseed them with 37 different species of trees, shrubs, and ferns.
David Sagan, a USFWS biologist, said, “In 15 years, we’ll get a canopy from these tree seedlings that’ll shade out the field tolerant invasive plants,” killing them.
Generous funding came from the Massachusetts office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, a federal agency that provided funding for the project under its Agricultural Conservation Easement Program. They contributed nearly a quarter of a million dollars to purchase a permanent easement on the Stebbins property, ensuring the property would remain undeveloped, and $411,000 to fund the restoration.
When French was asked for his final assessment of the collaboration, he said, “There’s tremendous efficiency in partnerships, and invaluable relationships,” adding, “We
executed a strategy that anyone of us could not have done by ourselves.”
“This is a positive model for future environmental projects, and we want to do more of them,” French said.
Bill Hobbs is a nature columnist for The Day in New London, CT. For comments, he can be reached at whobbs246@gmail.com.
"These bird losses are a strong signal that our human-altered landscapes are losing their ability to support birdlife."
–Ken Rosenberg, Cornell’s conservation scientist
One of us visited the heart of the Soviet Union during its latter days and was struck by the absence of birds in general, and certainly the absence of avian variety. Among the major differences between the USSR and North America was the lack of proven, sensible environmental laws and regulations governing such things as pesticides, hedgerow preservation, and land use in the Soviet Union. This fall, scientists at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology spearheaded a sobering report, “Decline of the North American Avifauna,” Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw1313 (2019), that forces us to moderate our pride in environmental regulations at home. The 11 authors, from government agencies and NGOs across the US and Canada, analyzed data collected over 50 years from a suite of A Rude Awakening and Call to Action governmental and citizen science programs. They found that the number of birds in North America has declined by nearly one third, or a loss of 2.9 billion birds, since 1970. According to Cornell’s conservation scientist, Ken Rosenberg, “These bird losses are a strong signal that our human-altered landscapes are losing their ability to support birdlife.”
The study raises at least two important questions of interest to those of us who live in the Connecticut River Watershed: First, which of our local birds are declining in number? The study says that grassland birds such as bobolinks have declined by more than 50%, and that more than 90% of the bird losses are from just twelve bird families such as sparrows, finches, and swallows. Redwinged Blackbirds, abundant within the CT River Valley, have declined on the North American continent from 260 million 50 years ago to 170 million today.
In terms of what each of us non-farmers can do to stem this decline, we should keep our cats indoors, make our windows bird-friendly, and support our local conservation groups. In coming issues, we will have more to say about this, but for now, let’s cherish what we have and work hard to better share this planet with all its creatures.
David Winkler
Professor in the Department of Ecology and
Evolutionary Biology at Cornell University
and Curator of Ornithology at
Cornell’s Museum of Vertebrates
Dick Shriver
Publisher
Letter from the Publisher:
estuary...A Magazine about Life of the Connecticut River
We elected to call our magazine estuary, not to focus on the estuary but because the estuary reflects the entire River and in fact its entire watershed, ecologically, historically, and recreationally.
There is an increased sense of community among those who share the same watershed, or valley, those areas that drain downward from a geological divider of some sort through lakes, rivers, and tributaries into something close to, say, sea level. Folks upstream realize that the way they live has an impact on those downstream, and those downstream are more respectful of how those who live upstream care for their stretch of the River.
One generally small fraction of any watershed, where it drains into the sea, is its estuary. The waters of estuaries are brackish, being a mixture of fresh water from upstream, and salt-water from the sea. Estuaries are home to unique plants and animals with many benefits to mankind. In the case of the Connecticut River, the estuary extends from Old Saybrook, Connecticut, where the River enters Long Island Sound, north for a distance of a mere 20 of the River’s 410 miles.
On a calm day, the estuary may also appear calm, but looks are deceiving. Underneath, with a rising tide, a massive salt-water wedge forces its way, with considerable unseen turbulence, along the bottom, with the less dense fresh water on top. Scientists know a great deal about these wedges, their chemical and biological makeup, and their impact, economic as well as ecological, on the estuary…and they want to know more.
Estuaries are important because of the unique plant and animal life they support. Water flows downstream carrying organic deposits from the entire watershed out into the sea (or Long Island Sound). Many of those deposits are subsequently returned upriver a relatively short distance by the next rising tide, thus providing the estuary with the lion’s share of the water-borne organic matter from the total watershed. Connecticut River’s estuary is a prime beneficiary of this phenomenon.
The Connecticut River estuary has adapted to a historic sea level rise of one tenth of an inch per year. To compensate, the estuary builds up its own shoreline with the large “clots” of organic matter that return upstream and are dispersed sideways into the marshes, with each tidal cycle. The increased rate of sea level rise to two tenths of an inch per year, which is what we are told is the rate today, may become too much for the estuary, and wetlands and salt marshes may not be able to keep their “heads above water.”
James O’Donnell, a scientist with the University of Connecticut’s Marine Sciences Department, has estimated that the sea level along Connecticut’s eastern shoreline may rise by as much as 20 inches by 2050. This means an average rate of half an inch per year, more than twice the two-tenths of an inch that is estimated to be the rate today. This could become a large problem for the estuary and for the many thousands of people who live in flood plains along the estuary.
And this is just one of the challenges facing the Connecticut River that we intend to cover in Estuary. The magazine will bring to our readers a wide range of topics about the “life and health of the River” covering not only science and conservation, but also recreation, birds and other wildlife, people, lifestyle, and history.
We at estuary can never know as much as we would like about the Connecticut River and its watershed. We can’t wait, however, to kayak down the Ottauquechee River in Vermont, traverse the Metacomet-Monadnock Trail around Mount Tom near Holyoke, Massachusetts, or cast a dry fly upon the Farmington River. We are excited as we observe, step by step, what scientists are doing to understand, preserve, and restore important features and attributes of the River.
We have thoroughly enjoyed these past few months just beginning to satisfy our curiosity about this region. We hope many of you will paddle along with us to learn much, much more about this amazing place we are fortunate to call home.
-Dick Shriver, Publisher
An invitation to submit stories
If you are reading this, there is an excellent chance you love the River as much as we do. The more we speak with readers like you, the more we hear new and interesting stories about the River. This is an invitation to submit those stories to us so that we might share them with other readers. We have a process for doing this. Go to estuarymagazine.com/submissions and read the detailed instructions on how to submit story ideas. You can also submit letters to the editor.
In every issue, we have six areas of interest for story submissions:
People. We’re interested in special people you know who have left their mark on the River, like famous artists, inventors, and engineers; interesting people behind current efforts to preserve the River and their work to enhance our watershed experience.
Recreation. Tell us about your joys of River recreation such as special fly-fishing spots, frostbite sailing in the winter, your kayak or canoe trips, and riverside bicycle tours or camping.
Science and Conservation. We want to know about special efforts to improve the quality of the River waters, fish ladders, dam removal, invasive plants, restoring habitat, even the geology of the River
from ancient times to today.
Wildlife. Tell us about your River birding adventures, and “Wildlife Wonders” like black bears, beaver, the osprey success story, and more.
Lifestyle and Culture. We’re interested in real people you know living on the River, their lives, their homes, their avocations; what they have contributed to the culture of the River through their art, their photography, and their poetry.
History. We’re interested in the rich history of the Connecticut River; stories of early colonial settlers, native Indian tribes, their art and culture, the history of River steamboats, shipbuilding, covered bridges, and more.
Estuary magazine has an editorial focus for each issue. This inaugural issue focuses on Science and Conservation. Our June issue will feature stories on Summer River Recreation. In September, we will feature stories about Migratory Birds and Wildlife, and in December, you will read aboutHistory, Winter Ice, and Waterfowl.
One thing I’ve learned as this project developed is that the River defines us as her own Community. Whether Upriver at the origin near Canada, or Mid-river through Vermont, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts, or where I live in Old Saybrook on the estuary, we, the River’s people, share a bond of love, respect, and care. I look forward to meeting many of you through Estuary, and hope you enjoy our articles and the extraordinary photographs that bring them to life.
–Lisa LeMonte, Managing Editor